Notes on Daniel -- Part 11 -- Calvin on the "little horn" of Daniel 7
By Jay Rogers
I would be agreeable to say that the spirit of antichrist has revealed itself in Antiochus Epiphanes, Julius Caesar, Nero Caesar, the papacy at the time of the Reformation -- and many others. There are many antichrist spirits that have gone out into the world.
However, nowhere does John Calvin write that the little horn of Daniel 7 is the pope or the papacy, as Dr. Lee has claimed.
In Institutes of the Christian Religion, he writes that the "Antichrist" spoken of by Paul (sic) may be compared to the person of Antiochus Epiphanes prophesied in Dan. 7:25. Calvin is not claiming here that the little horn is the same historical figure as the Man of Sin. In Calvin's Institutes the little horn is Antiochus, but in his Commentary on Daniel, he is Julius Caesar.
Here are Calvin's interpretations of the "little horn" of Daniel 7 --
**************************
Calvin's Institutes IV:7:25
To some we seem slanderous and petulant, when we call the Roman Pontiff Antichrist. But those who think so perceive not that they are bringing a charge of intemperance against Paul, after whom we speak, nay, in whose very words we speak. But lest any one object that Paul's words have a different meaning, and are wrested by us against the Roman Pontiff, I will briefly show that they can only be understood of the Papacy. Paul says that Antichrist would sit in the temple of God (2 Thess. 2:4). In another passage, the Spirit, portraying him in the person of Antiochus, says that his reign would be with great swelling words of vanity (Dan. 7:25). Hence we infer that his tyranny is more over souls than bodies, a tyranny set up in opposition to the spiritual kingdom of Christ. Then his nature is such, that he abolishes not the name either of Christ or the Church, but rather uses the name of Christ as a pretext, and lurks under the name of Church as under a mask. But though all the heresies and schisms which have existed from the beginning belong to the kingdom of Antichrist, yet when Paul foretells that defection will come, he by the description intimates that that seat of abomination will be erected, when a kind of universal defection comes upon the Church, though many members of the Church scattered up and down should continue in the true unity of the faith. But when he adds, that in his own time, the mystery of iniquity, which was afterwards to be openly manifested, had begun to work in secret, we thereby understand that this calamity was neither to be introduced by one man, nor to terminate in one man (see Calvin 2 Thess. 2:3; Dan. 7:9). Moreover, when the mark by which he distinguishes Antichrist is, that he would rob God of his honour and take it to himself, he gives the leading feature which we ought to follow in searching out Antichrist; especially when pride of this description proceeds to the open devastation of the Church. Seeing then it is certain that the Roman Pontiff has impudently transferred to himself the most peculiar properties of God and Christ, there cannot be a doubt that he is the leader and standard-bearer of an impious and abominable kingdom.
**************************
Calvin's Commentary on Daniel
"Wherefore it is our duty not to read carelessly
what is here written, but to weigh seriously and with
the greatest diligence what the Spirit intends by this
vision. I was attentive, therefore, says he, to the
horns, and behold one small one arose among them. Here
interpreters begin to vary; some twist this to mean
the Pope, and others the Turk; but neither opinion
seems to me probable; they are both wrong, since they
think the whole course of Christ's kingdom is here
described, while God wished only to declare to his
Prophet what should happen up to the first advent of
Christ. This, then, is the error of all those who wish
to embrace under this vision the perpetual state of
the Church up to the end of the world. But the Holy
Spirit's intention was completely different. We explained
at the beginning why this vision appeared to the Prophet
because the minds of the pious would constantly fail
them in the dreadful convulsions which were at hand,
when they saw the supreme dominion pass over to the
Persians. And then the Macedonians broke in upon them,
and acquired authority throughout; the whole of the
East, and afterwards those robbers who made war under
Alexander suddenly became kings, partly by cruelty
and partly by fraud and perfidy, which created more
strife than outward hostility. And when the faithful
saw all those monarchies perish, and the Roman Empire
spring up like a new prodigy, they would lose their
courage in such confused and turbulent changes. Thus
this vision was presented to the Prophet, that all
the children of God might understand what severe trials
awaited them before the advent of Christ. Daniel, then,
does not proceed beyond the promised redemption, and
does not embrace, as I have said, the whole kingdom,
of Christ, but is content to bring the faithful to
that exhibition of grace which they hoped and longed
for."
--
Before long, I think we will be repeating arguments over which Caesar or pope is represented by the little horn of Daniel 7.
My main contention so far is that Daniel 2 and 7 deal with the same historical events. Daniel 2 comprises the interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's dream and Daniel 7 the vision during the reign of Belshazzar. Both Daniel 2 and 7 are meant to point the Jews to the coming of the Messiah -- the King of kings.
Dan. 1:44 "And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever."
And in the days of these kings Simply put, in the days of the Roman Empire. At that time, the kingdom of God will be brought to earth by Jesus Christ shall never be destroyed but it shall war against the kingdoms of this world and they shall become part of the kingdom of God and of His Christ (Rev 11:15).
The purpose of Daniel 2 and 7, as well as the entire prophecy of Daniel, is to point to the time of the Messiah. The purpose of Daniel is to identify Jesus Christ. If the fourth kingdom is the Roman Empire, then the Messiah appeared during that time and overcame the kingdoms of this world.
And conversely, if the Messiah appeared in the days of the fourth kingdom, then it does not follow that the fourth kingdom has continued beyond the time of the coming of Messiah's kingdom to this day -- either through the papacy or any other system of government.
Back to document index
The Real Jesus: Who is the Real Jesus? Ever since the dawn of modern rationalism, skeptics have sought to use textual criticism, archaeology and historical reconstructions to uncover the "historical Jesus" -- a wise teacher who said many wonderful things, but fulfilled no prophecies, performed no miracles and certainly did not rise from the dead in triumph over sin. Over the past 100 years, however, startling discoveries in biblical archaeology and scholarship have all but vanquished the faulty assumptions of these doubting modernists. Regretably, these discoveries have often been ignored by the skeptics as well as by the popular media. As a result, the liberal view still holds sway in universities and impacts the culture and even much of the church.
|
This presentation explodes the myths of these critics and the movies, books and television programs that have popularized their views.
Presented in ten parts -- perfect for individual, family and classroom study -- viewers will be challenged to go deeper in their knowledge of Christ in order to be able to defend their faith and present the truth to a skeptical modern world – that the Jesus of the Gospels is the Jesus of history -- "the same yesterday, today and forever" (Hebrews 13:8). He is the real Jesus. Speakers include: George Grant, Ted Baehr, Stephen Mansfield, Raymond Ortlund, Phil Kayser, David Lutzweiler, Jay Grimstead, J.P. Holding, and Eric Holmberg. Ten parts, over two hours of instruction! Running Time: 130 minutes
|
| The Beast of Revelation: IDENTIFIED
Who is the dreaded beast of Revelation? Now at last, a plausible candidate for this personification of evil incarnate has been identified (or re-identified). Ken Gentry's insightful analysis of scripture and history is likely to revolutionize your understanding of the book of Revelation -- and even more importantly -- amplify and energize your entire Christian worldview! Historical footage and other graphics are used to illustrate the lecture Dr. Gentry presented at the 1999 Ligonier Conference in Orlando, Florida. It is followed by a one-hour question and answer session addressing the key concerns and objections typically raised in response to his position. This presentation also features an introduction that touches on not only the confusion and controversy surrounding this issue -- but just why it may well be one of the most significant issues facing the Church today. Ideal for group meetings, personal Bible study -- for anyone who wants to understand the historical context of John's famous letter "... to the seven churches which are in Asia." (Revelation 1:4) |
(Available in DVD only) $17.95 ORDER NOW!
|
INCLUDES A FREE Sixteen Christian leaders and scholars answer some of the most common questions and misperceptions related to this volatile issue: Download the free |
Perfect for group instruction as well as personal
Bible study. Speakers include: George Grant, Howard Phillips,
R.C. Sproul Jr., Ken Gentry, Gary DeMar, Jay Grimstead, R.J. Rushdoony,
Steven Schlissel, Andrew Sandlin, Eric Holmberg, and more!
Ten parts, over four hours of instruction! Watch over 60 streaming videos from God's Law and Society at:
Price reduced! |
| Amazing Grace: The History and Theology of Calvinism
Over four hours of instruction! Just what is “Calvinism?” Does this teaching make man a deterministic robot and God the author of sin? What about free will? If the church accepts Calvinism, won’t evangelism be stifled, perhaps even extinguished? How can we balance God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility? What are the differences between historic Calvinism and hyper-Calvinism? Why did men like Augustine, Luther, Calvin, Spurgeon, Whitefield, Edwards and a host of renowned Protestant evangelists embrace the teaching of predestination and election and deny free will theology? This is the first video documentary that answers these and other related questions. Hosted by Eric Holmberg, this fascinating three-part, four-hour presentation is detailed enough so as to not gloss over the controversy. At the same time, it is broken up into ten “Sunday-school-sized” sections to make the rich content manageable and accessible for the average viewer. |
$19.95 ORDER NOW!
|
|
The Forerunner Forum is the discussion group for this web site. The purpose of the group is to engage in discussion about the articles on-line. If you want to discuss any article or video on this web site, visit The Forerunner Forum. |
| VIDEOS | WORDS | BLOG | DISCUSSION | WHAT'S NEW | ABOUT US | FEEDBACK | SEARCH | DONATE | JAY'S BIO | HOME |
For more information, contact:
| The Forerunner jrogers@forerunner.com |
|
P.O. Box 362173 Melbourne, FL 32936-2173 |
