Jay Rogers
Director:
Jay Rogers

Recent Posts

The Forerunner

Rebuttal to Classic Premillennialism

By Jay Rogers
Published April 2008

In rebutting classic premillennialism, it should first be noted that there is a great area of agreement between classic premillennialists, amillennialists, and postmillennialists.

All Christians agree that the church, called “the Bride” and “the New Jerusalem” in Revelation 20, exists both in heaven and on earth prior to the Second Coming. We agree that Revelation 20 describes the final attack of Satan’s forces against Christ and the church. All Christians agree that Christ will return in bodily form at the end of history to judge the living and the dead.

We should agree that the events that are to precede the Second Coming are as follows:

We should agree that the events of the Second Coming are as follows:

This is called the “common church doctrine,” because it has been the prevalent idea among all Christians for 2000 years. For the first few hundred years of church history, the common doctrine did not even have a name. There was no elaborate differentiation of millennial theories such as is found among today’s Bible scholars. It was simply the broad statement of faith of the Apostle’s Creed and the teachings of the church fathers.

The Rift in the Common Eschatology of the Church

At face value, there is no great contradiction between premillennialism, amillennialism, and postmillennialism in light of the common church doctrine. The common church doctrine is that there is to be a personal, visible, and glorious advent of the Son of God. The main debate between premillennialists, amillennialists and postmillennialists is over the exact chronology of end-times events, and more importantly, the exact nature of the millennium. Is Christ’s rule during the millennium heavenly or earthly? Is there a thousand year gap between the Second Coming and the final judgment? Are certain biblical passages to be understood as end-times events or as already fulfilled prophecy? Is Revelation to be interpreted literally or figuratively?

Two of the most common objections to postmillennialists are that we spiritualize too much of the book of Revelation and that we postmillennialists are people who want to establish Christ’s kingdom on earth by “taking over the world using the arm of the flesh.”

Earthly Rule vs. Heavenly Rule

The debate between earthly rule vs. heavenly rule is not new. Classic Premillennialism has been a view of the church since the early centuries. At that time, the idea was called chiliasm (also known as millennarianism). Chiliasm is derived from Greek word for “thousand,” kilo. A chiliast is a person who teaches that the “thousand year” reign of Christ depicted by John in Revelation 20, is an earthly, immanent kingdom.

Yet if Revelation 20:9 is read through a premillennial filter (with Christ ruling from an earthly Jerusalem during a future 1000 year period), then Christ will rule from an earthly Jerusalem in Palestine. Even more problematic is the teaching that Christ’s kingdom is postponed until the Second Coming.

“My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36).

“Then Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, ‘All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth’” (Mt. 28:18).

“The LORD said to my Lord, ‘Sit at My right hand, till I make Your enemies Your foot- stool’” (Acts 2:34-35).

“Therefore when Jesus perceived that they were about to come and take Him by force to make Him king, He departed again to a mountain by Himself alone” (John 6:15).

“[God] raised Him from the dead and seated Him at His right hand in the heavenly places, far above all principality and power and might and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age but also in that which is to come” (Eph. 1:20-21).

“Our citizenship is in heaven” (Phil. 3:20).

“For here [on earth] we have no continuing city, but we seek the one to come” (Heb. 13:13-14).

“But now they desire a better, that is, a heavenly country … for He has prepared a city for them” (Heb. 11:16).

Postmillennialsits try to be as consistent as possible with the whole Bible’s teaching on the kingdom of God. According to Jesus, the kingdom of God is not earthly but heavenly, yet Christ rules over the nations from heaven now. Christ does not have to wait to be given earthly authority, because it has already been given.

Throughout history, premillennialists have often made predictions as to the exact date of the premillennial return of Jesus Christ. The year 1000 A.D. was thought to be the time off Jesus’ Second Coming by chiliasts of that era. So too, the year 2000 is thought to be somewhere near the “end-times.” The Bible teaches that Christ’s kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36); nor does it consist of earthly things (Rom. 14:17). Jesus said to His disciples concerning His Second Coming: “It is not for you to know the times or seasons which the Father has put in His authority” (Acts 1:7).

The Second Coming and the Final Judgment

Premillennialism teaches that there is a 1000-year gap between the Second Coming of Christ and the final judgment. The resurrection of the saints and the resurrection of the wicked are also separated by a thousand years. (The dispensational premillennialist view separates these two events by 1007 years.) Both the postmillennialist and amillennialist view maintain that these events are virtually simultaneous. Which view does the Bible support?

“… when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God, and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, when He comes, in that day, to be glorified in His saints and to be admired among all those who believe” (2 Th. 1:7-10).

“But each one in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who are Christ’s at His coming. Then comes the end, when He delivers the kingdom to God the Father, when He puts an end to all enemies under His feet. The last enemy that will be destroyed is death…. Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; nor does corruption inherit incorruption. Behold I tell you a mystery: We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed-in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. For this corruption must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality…. Then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written: ‘Death is swallowed up in victory’” (1 Cor. 15:23-25, 50-54).

“But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up. Therefore, since all these things will be dissolved, what manner of persons ought you to be in holy conduct and godliness, looking for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be dissolved, being on fire, and the elements will melt with fervent heat?” (2 Pet. 3: -12).

“Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming in which all who are in the graves will hear His voice and come forth, those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of condemnation” (John. 5:28-29).

Through a careful examination of these scriptures and others describing the Second Coming, I found no evidence for a premillennial advent. In fact, I came to believe that the Bible explicitly teaches a simultaneous Second Coming and final judgment.

What then can be the meaning of the millennium in Revelation 20? Many Christians throughout history have assumed that the millennium cannot be here now, because of “all the evil things that are going on in the world.” As evidence of this, the scripture is given that Satan is still the “prince of this world” (John 16:11) and therefore Christ’s rule has not yet come.

As supposed proof that the millennium is a future, earthly kingdom, Stortz quotes Revelation 20:3: “He threw Him into the Abyss, and locked and sealed it over him, to keep him from deceiving the nation anymore until the thousand years were ended.” Stortz thus argues, “This is not the Millennium, because Satan is still deceiving the nations.”

While it is true that Satan is not bound in every respect, it is still true that Satan is bound in respect to having dominion over the heathen nations. Until Christ came, the Satan was not bound in this manner. But ever since the Gospel of the kingdom was preached, this power of hell has been vanquished. Jesus states in John 16:11 that although Satan is the “prince of this world,” that he is already judged by God. In fact, Jesus demonstrated his dominion over demons as a sign that the kingdom had indeed come. “But if I with the finger of God cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you” (Luke 11:20).

Postmillennialists view the millennium as the metaphor to describe the reign of Christ’s kingdom in history. Although the kingdom won’t come in its fullness until Christ returns, the kingdom has already come through the ministry of Christ. Although it is a heavenly kingdom with the seat of authority in heaven, it is also manifest in the earth.

Futurism vs. Preterism

Since premillennialists interpret the millennium to be a future earthly kingdom, they also assign nearly every biblical prophecy in Daniel, Matthew 25 (the Mount Olivet Discourse) and Revelation (as well as many other “apocalyptic” passages in scripture) to the future and usually the not-too-distant future.

My interpretation of most of the book of Revelation is preterist. That is, most of the book of Revelation (and the Mount of Olivet Discourse) deals with first century events. Daniel deals mainly with events leading up to the first coming of Chris, not his Second Coming. These are not primarily eschatological books, although the Second Coming comes into view in these prophecies.

Daniel Interpreted

I agree with Storz’s critique of the popular dispensational approach to Daniel. There is no break in the 70 years of Daniel that leads us to the time of Christ and picks up again during a future “end-times” tribulation. I see this seventy years as continuous. My main disagreement with Storz is that although he correctly sees Daniel as fulfilled prophecy, he still places the book of Revelation in the far off future. Daniel is, in fact, the back drop to Revelation. This is an interpretive approach little understood in our day. This situation underscores my contention that the main issues between postmillennialists and other vew, arise not just from our different interpretation of Revelation 20, but from a vastly different hermeneutical approach to the entire Bible.

Many Bible interpreters, especially premillennialists, have sought to apply a futurist interpretation placing at least some of the events described in chapters 2, 7-12 as yet to take place. The best possible explanation of Daniel is preterist interpretation. The events described in Daniel were fulfilled at or before the time of Christ. This position creates the least amount of problems from an interpretive standpoint. Only a fair knowledge of ancient history is needed to do this. Nevertheless, there are few commentaries on the bookshelves today fully describing the preterist point of view.

From our perspective today, an understanding of Daniel is paramount to understanding the Mount of Olives Discourse in Matthew 24, Luke 20 and Mark 13. In two of these passages, Jesus refers to the “abomination of desolation refereed to in the prophecy of Daniel.” In Mark 13:14, the author inserts the aside: (“let the reader understand”).

“Understand what exactly?” one might ask.

Obviously, from the context, we must understand this passage of Daniel. And unless we have the correct interpretation of Daniel, we will not be able to understand the Mount of Olives Discourse. Therefore, a historical approach to Daniel is necessary for understanding the purpose of the book of Daniel. Daniel was a prophecy given so that the restored Jews would know the times and events surrounding the coming of the Messiah. That is the main purpose of Daniel chapters 2, 7-12.

I cannot in so short a space, include my entire interpretation of Daniel from a preterist approach. However, I will present a short preterist interpretation of Daniel chapters 2, 7, 9-12. I will conclude by showing the flaws in futurist approaches. What follows is not meant to be a complete commentary on the entire book of Daniel or even an exhaustive treatment of the passages quoted here. I am here merely interpreting the language and symbols of the predictive passages by applying them to known historical events.

Daniel 2 — In this chapter, Daniel interprets a dream for King Nebuchadnezzar. It’s important to note that Daniel had apparently had the same dream or vision, because he first tells the king the contents of the dream he had. Daniel then interprets the dream.

36. This is the dream; and we will tell the interpretation thereof before the king.
37. Thou, O king, art a king of kings: for the God of heaven hath given thee a kingdom, power, and strength, and glory.
38. And wheresoever the children of men dwell, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the heaven hath he given into thine hand, and hath made thee ruler over them all. Thou art this head of gold.
39. And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth.

Another kingdom inferior to thee — This refers to the Medes and the Persians.

Another third kingdom of brass — This refers to the conquest of the world by Alexander the Great.

40. And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things: and as iron that breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise.

The fourth kingdom — The successors of Alexander, the kings of Syria and Egypt, arose after Alexander’s untimely death. This includes the entire Greco-Roman period including the Roman Empire. Up until the time of the birth of Christ, the Roman Empire was plagued by numerous civil wars. Although some commentators disagree here, the fourth kingdom is thought to include the entire time from Alexander until the rule of the ten kings, the Roman Emperors, who brought Pax Romana (“peace”) to the Empire.

41. And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters’ clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay.
42. And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.
43. And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.

Iron mixed with miry clay — This refers to the military might of the Roman Empire which brought a forced union of all the nations of the world including the nations of Judea and Samaria. Thus the seed of men are the Jews at the time of the Roman Empire who were mixed with the iron military might of the Empire, but did not come fully under the dominion of Caesar.

44. And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.

And in the days of these kings — Simply put, in the days of the Roman Empire. At that time, the kingdom of God will be brought to earth by Jesus Christ shall never be destroyed but it shall war against the kingdoms of this world and they shall become part of the kingdom of God and of His Christ (Rev 11:15).

45. Forasmuch as thou sawest that the stone was cut out of the mountain without hands, and that it brake in pieces the iron, the brass, the clay, the silver, and the gold; the great God hath made known to the king what shall come to pass hereafter: and the dream is certain, and the interpretation thereof sure.

The stone made without hands — This does not refer to Jesus the Messiah himself as many futurists have imagined. But it is stated plainly that the stone is the kingdom of God. This kingdom appeared in the days of the Roman Empire at the coming of Christ.

Daniel was rewarded for telling the dream and giving the interpretation. The king made Daniel the ruler over Babylon. Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego became rulers over the provinces of Babylon.

Daniel 7 — Another king arose in Babylon. Daniel now has great authority in the kingdom. In this chapter, it is Daniel himself who relates a vision and its interpretation.

1. In the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon Daniel had a dream and visions of his head upon his bed: then he wrote the dream, and told the sum of the matters.
2. Daniel spake and said, I saw in my vision by night, and, behold, the four winds of the heaven strove upon the great sea.
3. And four great beasts came up from the sea, diverse one from another.
4 . The first was like a lion, and had eagle’s wings: I beheld till the wings thereof were plucked, and it was lifted up from the earth, and made stand upon the feet as a man, and a man’s heart was given to it.
5. And behold another beast, a second, like to a bear, and it raised up itself on one side, and it had three ribs in the mouth of it between the teeth of it: and they said thus unto it, Arise, devour much flesh.
6. After this I beheld, and lo another, like a leopard, which had upon the back of it four wings of a fowl; the beast had also four heads; and dominion was given to it.
7. After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns.

Four great beasts — These again are the four great kingdoms, the Chaldean, Medio-Persian, Greek and Roman Empires. This is the same vision as in chapter two, but with different symbolism. While some choose to understand the fourth beast as the successors of Alexander, especially the kings who ruled in Asia and Syria, the thrust of the whole prophecy of Daniel indicates that it is the Roman Empire at the time of the coming of Christ.

Ten horns — These are the ten kings also mentioned in Revelation 17:12. These ten kings are the ten Emperors of the Roman Empire to 70 AD. The Roman Emperors were greater than all the other world rulers before him. Including Julius Caesar, there are ten Emperors until the time of the destruction of Jerusalem. They are Julius, Augustus, Tiberius, Gaius, Claudius, Nero, Galba, Otho, Vitellius, Vespasian. The reign of these kings parallel the period of the ministry of the Messiah and of the Apostles.

8. I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things.

Another little horn — Some have applied this to the Syrian ruler Antiochus Epiphanes shorrtly after the time of Alexander. Antiochus’ desecration of the Temple in 336 BC is prophesied in Daniel 8:9. But keeping with the consistent application of this passage to the Roman Empire, I must conclude that this speaks of Nero Caesar. He is the little horn “among them” the sixth of the ten Emperors. Thus he is “another little horn.”

Three of the first horns plucked up by the roots — Three Emperors, Tiberius, Caligula and Claudius were assassinated to make way for Nero, who was not in the line of succession.

9. I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.
10 A fiery stream issued and came forth from before him: thousand thousands ministered unto him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him: the judgment was set, and the books were opened.

The Ancient of days — This passage speaks of God the Father. This is one of the Old Testament passages in which we see the three persons Trinity. Some interpret the “fiery stream” a symbolizing the Holy Spirit who proceeds from the Father and the Son.

11 I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spake: I beheld even till the beast was slain, and his body destroyed, and given to the burning flame.

The beast was slain — This speaks of the destruction of the Roman Empire and especially of Nero who committed suicide by slaying himself with a military sword used to kill many people.

12. As concerning the rest of the beasts, they had their dominion taken away: yet their lives were prolonged for a season and time.

As concerning the rest of the beasts — After Nero, the power of the Roman Emperors was greatly diminished, yet they continued.

13. I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.

The Son of Man — This speaks of Jesus Christ, the Son of God who is fully God and fully man. In the Gospels, Jesus identities himself as the “Son of man” in order to identify himself as the Messiah.

14 . And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.

Dominion, and glory, and a kingdom — Christ was given the keys of the kingdom by God the Father when he sat down at the right hand of God after His resurrection and ascension. This kingdom is not a future kingdom. It began in the days of the Roman Empire. It overcame Rome and will overcome all the kingdoms of this world. It will last forever.

15. I Daniel was grieved in my spirit in the midst of my body, and the visions of my head troubled me.
16. I came near unto one of them that stood by, and asked him the truth of all this. So he told me, and made me know the interpretation of the things.
17. These great beasts, which are four, are four kings, which shall arise out of the earth.
18. But the saints of the most High shall take the kingdom, and possess the kingdom for ever, even for ever and ever.

The saints of the most High shall take the kingdom — Here is a dominion mandate given not only to Christ, but to the saints. We are to possess the whole kingdom the whole world for the dominion of Jesus Christ. This commission was given at the time of Christ.

19. Then I would know the truth of the fourth beast, which was diverse from all the others, exceeding dreadful, whose teeth were of iron, and his nails of brass; which devoured, brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with his feet;
20. And of the ten horns that were in his head, and of the other which came up, and before whom three fell; even of that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spake very great things, whose look was more stout than his fellows.

Before whom three fell — During the life-time of Nero three Caesars were assassinated in order to make way for him. These were Tiberius, Caligula and Claudius.

21. I beheld, and the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them;

The same horn made war with the saints — Nero began a persecution of the saints which began in 63 AD and lasted until his death.

22. Until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the most High; and the time came that the saints possessed the kingdom.
23. Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.
24. And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.

Another shall rise after them — Nero was born one year after the death of the first Caesar Augustus. Nero was not in the direct line of succession, but three Emperors were assassinated to make way for him.

25. And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.

Until a time and times and the dividing of time — Literally, “time, times, half a time.” If we understand a time to mean a year, then it is three and a half years. Nero’s persecution of the church lasted exactly 42 months or three and a half years.

26. But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end.
27. And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him.
28. Hitherto is the end of the matter. As for me Daniel, my cogitations much troubled me, and my countenance changed in me: but I kept the matter in my heart.

An everlasting kingdom — The purpose of this passage, and the entire prophecy of Daniel, is to give the Jews a correct understanding of the time when the Messiah would come and to declare when the kingdom of heaven would come on earth.

Daniel 9 — When Jesus declared that the kingdom of heaven was at hand, he alluded to Daniel stating that He was the Messiah, the Son of man spoken of by Daniel. In this chapter, the exact timing of the coming of the Messiah is given.

24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.

Seventy weeks of years, i.e., 490 years, are determined until the time of the coming of the Messiah, the Christ.

25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

From the going forth of the commandment, etc.: i.e., from the 20th year of King Artaxerxes, when by his commandment Nehemiah rebuilt the walls of Jerusalem (Nehemiah 2). From this time, according to the best chronology, there were just 69 weeks of years (483 years) to the baptism of Jesus Christ, when he first began to preach and execute the office of the Messiah.

Even in troublous times — This refers to the difficulties and obstacles Nehemiah met in building, and to the shortness of time in which they finished the wall, i.e., fifty-two days.

26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

And the people of the prince — The Roman legions under their general, Titus, the son of the Emperor Vespasian, who destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple in 70 AD.

27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

In the midst of the week, or, in the middle of the week — Christ preached for three-and a-half years and then by His sacrifice on the cross abolished all the sacrifices of the law.

The overspreading of abominations — This most likely refers to the “abomination of desolation” the bringing of ensigns and standards of the pagan Romans in to the Temple. Antiochus Epiphanes of the Assyrians profaned the Temple restored in the time of Ezra. Titus, Roman destructor of Herod’s Temple, profaned the Temple in 70 AD. This could also refer to the profanation of the Temple by the Jews who rejected the Messiah.

Daniel 10 — Beginning in Daniel 10 and throughout the rest of the visions, Daniel is given a list of kings who will drive most of world history until the time of the Messiah. Futurists will apply an interpretation to these chapters that puts all of these rulers in the future. However, a preterist approach is a great testimony to the power of the scriptures as God’s Word. It is amazing that these prophecies have been fulfilled to the minutest detail. here we have an accurate outline of history, prophesied even before any of the events took place, which point to the exact time of the coming of the Messiah. So that we should not miss the Messiah, the major world rulers of the fourth kingdom, Greece and Rome, leading up to the time of Christ are depicted. In Daniel 10, an angel appears to the prophet and gives an interpretation of a vision. This prophecy occurs during the reign of Cyrus, king of the Persians.

Daniel 11 — The angel shows Daniel the wars and succession of kings in the Persian and Grecian empires. The kings of Egypt and Syria are noted. Judea was between their dominions, and affected by their wars. The remainder of this chapter is controversial. Commentators differ much respecting it. Many commentators have interpreted these verses to pertain to a future antichrist, however, the context points us to Antiochus Epiphanes, the cruel and violent persecutor of the Jews. The end of chapter 11 brings us to the beginning of the Roman Empire, to “the days of those kings” (Daniel 2:44).

Daniel 12 — The end of the book of Daniel speaks to us about the events of the first century.

1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.

There shall be a time of trouble — Refers to the great tribulation from 68 to 70 AD.

2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.

Many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake — This refers to the gospel being preached. Many who sleep in the dust, both Jews and Gentiles, shall be awakened by it out of their heathenism of Judaism. And in the end the multitude that sleep in the dust shall awake; many shall arise to life, and many to shame.

3 And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever.

They that be wise shall shine — There is glory reserved for all the saints in the future state, for all that are wise, wise for their souls and eternity. Those who turn many to righteousness, who turn sinners from the errors of their ways, and help to save their souls from death (James 5:20) will share in the glory of those they have helped to heaven, which will add to their own glory.

4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.

The time of the end — The time when these prophecies shall be fulfilled. This is not a reference to the “end-times.”

8 And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things?
9 And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end.
10 Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.
11 And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days.

Thousand two hundred and ninety days — This refers to the siege of Jerusalem from Spring 67 AD to the fall of the Temple in Sept. 70. Vespasian enters the Land in Spring 67, but Jerusalem does not fall until 70.

12 Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days.

Thousand three hundred and five and thirty days — This is another 45 days beyond the time of trouble. Those who were forewarned and survived the holocaust were Christians living in Jerusalem who had been forewarned by Jesus’ prophecy to flee the city to the hills of Judea in order to wait out the siege.

13 But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot at the end of the days.

The end of the days — The end of the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days. This does not refer to the “end times” in an eschatological sense as many have supposed.

The Futurist and “Dual Fulfillment” Dilemma

After understanding the strong argument in favor of the preterist interpretation, many will readily admit that what I have described here is, more or less, the correct interpretation. Some scholars and Bible students, still wanting to cling to a futurist interpretation, then propose what is termed the “Dual Fulfillment Theory.”

It is obvious that most of Daniel’s prophecies have been fulfilled. Most futurists readily admit this, but do not make the historical applications to all of the kingdoms and rulers of ancient history as I have done here. What they do instead is to take some of the obscure passages and apply them to future events.

Could it be that prophecies work on a number of different levels? That it was, on one level, speaking about some things that were about to happen but that it could be speaking to us today about things that are about to take place? Is there such a thing as a “dual fulfillment” of the prophecies in Revelation?

Are we to believe that all of the details of Daniel , the Mount Olivet Discourse, and Revelation occur twice? Two six-sealed scrolls? Two beasts? Two groups of 144,000? Two Armageddons? Two Millenniums? On and on we could go. If you adopt a dual-fulfillment view, you are doing so on the basis of theological prejudice, not sound methods of interpretation.

Literal vs. Figurative

Postmillennialists are criticized when we understand “thousand” as a figurative term meaning a “very long time.” Ironically, premillennialists take very little of chapter 20 literally. Do premillennialists teach that armies in the future will be riding horses and using wooden weapons? Are there literally going to be two countries named Gog and Magog? It is impossible for premillennialists to be perfectly consistent in this approach.

When premillennialists insist that every “thousand” in the Bible be taken literally, I point them to the following passage.

“Know therefore that the LORD thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations” (Deut. 7:9).

If a generation is at least forty years, and a “thousand generations” is taken literally here, then the Second Coming cannot occur until at least 40,000 years after Abraham still a long way off! So whether you must always take a “thousand” literally or not, postmillennialism is true in the respect that we still have a long way to go before Christ’s Second Coming.

For many, that will seem incredible. It cuts across the grain of the most recent popular teachings on the end-times. For years, Christians have been taught to expect defeat and a quick deliverance from tribulation. Yet postmillennial optimism is not a new idea. In fact, most Christians throughout history held to a hopeful eschatology. Most regarded the eschatology of defeat to be a tertiary heresy.

The Bible gives us the eschatology of victory. This is not blind optimism. There will be tribulation. But before the Second Coming of Christ, the Gospel will be preached and Christianity will take root, grow, and bear fruit throughout the world.


The Four Keys to the Millennium (Book)

Foundations in Biblical Eschatology

By Jay Rogers, Larry Waugh, Rodney Stortz, Joseph Meiring. High quality paperback, 167 pages.

All Christians believe that their great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, will one day return. Although we cannot know the exact time of His return, what exactly did Jesus mean when he spoke of the signs of His coming (Mat. 24)? How are we to interpret the prophecies in Isaiah regarding the time when “the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the waters cover the sea” (Isa. 11:19)? Should we expect a time of great tribulation and apostasy or revival and reformation before the Lord returns? Is the devil bound now, and are the saints reigning with Christ? Did you know that there are four hermeneutical approaches to the book of Daniel and Revelation?

These and many more questions are dealt with by four authors as they present the four views on the millennium. Each view is then critiqued by the other three authors.

$12.95 — ORDER NOW!

(We accept all major credit cards and PayPal.)

Click here for more information


Related Articles:

Share |

Search this site:
View CCNow Cart/Checkout
View CCNow Cart/Checkout

RSS
Subscribe to
The Forerunner

Have The Forerunner Weblog sent straight to your inbox!

Enter your email address:

YouTube
The Forerunner Channel on YouTube


Promote Your Page Too

Featured Product
If you like the articles on this website, you may also be interested in:

Featured Articles

Live Seminar!

Real Jesus
The Abortion Matrix DVD: Update

The Abortion Matrix:
Defeating Child Sacrifice and the Culture of Death

is a 195-minute presentation that traces the biblical roots of child sacrifice and then delves into the social, political and cultural fall-out that this sin against God has produced. You can order this series on DVD, read the complete script and view clips on-line...
continued ...


View My Stats